From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HnvDG-0006Ry-79 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:29:06 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4FBGIcX004291; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:16:18 GMT Received: from gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.111]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4FBCAER029690 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:12:11 GMT Received: from [192.168.150.87] (a91-152-108-214.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.152.108.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B2621615F for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 14:12:09 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <46499588.5000003@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:12:08 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070409) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking virtuals stable References: <17993.36648.37167.198946@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <46499076.6090401@gentoo.org> <17993.37916.578366.696016@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <17993.37916.578366.696016@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig520843058CE7BBFABF159D52" X-Archives-Salt: e678d2d8-5cbe-4185-96a7-501d0053ca6a X-Archives-Hash: 682b30a8c8aa0b29602645271b19f603 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig520843058CE7BBFABF159D52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ulrich Mueller kirjoitti: >>>>>> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >=20 >>> I could not find any official guidelines for keywording of virtual >>> packages. >=20 >> They are keyworded as any other packages. You can't make them stable >> if they have ~arch only dependencies. When one provider is stable, >> they are fine to go stable. >=20 > Yes, I think this part is clear. >=20 > The point of my question was more if the usual rules apply, i.e.: > keywording and stabilising only by arch teams; wait one month before > the package can go stable. Which seems not to be current practice for > virtual packages. (And makes no sense anyway, IMHO.) >=20 > Ulrich The month is not set in stone. About who marks them, it's probably best to get the opinion of the arch teams. I don't think they will object to normal developers marking them. Arch teams: what do you think? Regards, Petteri --------------enig520843058CE7BBFABF159D52 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGSZWIcxLzpIGCsLQRAk4eAJ4v4kJ5nCn6I8A8wTxRo9Jr3p/FmgCff/+7 0agvd8g0o8K/jdcrG/0MoBs= =Xp0s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig520843058CE7BBFABF159D52-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list