From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hkcix-0003ye-0h for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 May 2007 09:08:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l46966wl024933; Sun, 6 May 2007 09:06:06 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4692Wgm019596 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 09:02:32 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.1] (253.199.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.199.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEE964FB2 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 09:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <463D9998.4090100@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 11:02:16 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: modifications to GLEP42 References: <463CF698.6090904@gentoo.org> <20070505223429.52937697@snowflake> <200705052204.03958.hydrogen@notyetimplemented.com> <463D97B6.6010202@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <463D97B6.6010202@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=CEBA3D9E; url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0481722EFFF705CE75DA4B41" X-Archives-Salt: 84ae59fc-6795-4011-b2e0-8d2e703e5cb4 X-Archives-Hash: 8d2d271b616fa96e18c0addf26a18fa6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0481722EFFF705CE75DA4B41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Petteri R=E4ty napsal(a): > Dan Meltzer kirjoitti: >> mmm, by this arguement news should be written for every version bump, = >> explaining what has changed in the package that is user visible. It w= ould=20 >> definatly improve the users experience if they knew what they were upg= rading=20 >> to, not just that they were upgrading. >> >=20 > For the standard version bumps people should be documenting things like= > this in ChangeLog. Too bad it's usually just "Version bump. Fixes bug > #XXXXXX." Well, 'fixes bug #XXXXXX' is still way more useful entry than 'many bugfixes' or nothing at all in ChangeLog - which is not so rare at all, unfortunately :/ --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enig0481722EFFF705CE75DA4B41 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGPZmhhxfV/c66PZ4RA91EAKDFfvVJhtZPROnHYWmgHGEhfPvtiwCeOsfK f8r8zlqeH1NeyXmD4ZnNdzE= =ROIF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0481722EFFF705CE75DA4B41-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list