From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23395-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HkQXc-00051g-9Q
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 20:07:41 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45K6hHR019510;
	Sat, 5 May 2007 20:06:43 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45K3LYi014721
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 5 May 2007 20:03:22 GMT
Received: from [192.168.0.1] (253.199.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.199.253])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014276459E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  5 May 2007 20:03:20 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <463CE2FC.3000500@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 22:03:08 +0200
From: Jakub Moc <jakub@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24
References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org>	<20070505114454.GD23900@kfk4ever.com>	<20070505135020.4d129619@snowflake>	<463CBA22.7070200@gentoo.org>	<20070505182147.21bdd7ff@snowflake>	<20070505173422.GA1263@superlupo.rechner>	<20070505184647.3382e737@snowflake>	<20070505191838.GB1263@superlupo.rechner> <20070505202914.3f49a88b@snowflake>
In-Reply-To: <20070505202914.3f49a88b@snowflake>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
OpenPGP: id=CEBA3D9E;
	url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig9D0D6EF16DD44F76E49F63D9"
X-Archives-Salt: 88ba43d6-58fc-4109-9f40-6644dd3e3ea3
X-Archives-Hash: 2e33a754bca9d739cb19762f5c51626c

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig9D0D6EF16DD44F76E49F63D9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Sat, 5 May 2007 21:18:38 +0200
> Wernfried Haas <amne@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:46:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>>> It warns noisily.=20
>> Then it's not even close to being broken and i don't see the need for
>> a news item.
>=20
> You don't use Paludis. Paludis users do see the need for a news item.
>=20

Well, then frankly feed those news to your overlay users; we don't need
such stuff abused in gentoo-x86 because paludis users are unable
(according to your claims) read explicit runtime deprecation warnings.

Because the above is clearly stupid - what are you really after here,
may I ask? I guess amne is right here.


--=20
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3=
D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)


--------------enig9D0D6EF16DD44F76E49F63D9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGPOMBhxfV/c66PZ4RA7QDAKCU0m1LIlkxPmboXcheJQMqYOHC+ACbBAyd
cdLMfUky2aVQgbpzGAFsvAg=
=zjSc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig9D0D6EF16DD44F76E49F63D9--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list