From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hk6kL-00080r-0o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 22:59:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l44MwVEL005780; Fri, 4 May 2007 22:58:31 GMT Received: from slimak.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l44MuaoI003516 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 22:56:36 GMT Received: (qmail 53363 invoked by uid 0); 4 May 2007 22:56:35 -0000 Received: from r141.net.upc.cz (HELO ?192.168.1.1?) (62.24.83.141) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 4 May 2007 22:56:35 -0000 Message-ID: <463BBA23.8060707@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 00:56:35 +0200 From: Vlastimil Babka User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070421) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org> <463BA9BF.4080708@digital-trauma.de> <200705042356.10789.peper@gentoo.org> <463BAFF8.80100@gentoo.org> <20070504222225.GA11120@anubis.perspektivbredband.net> <463BB3ED.7020606@gentoo.org> <20070504233715.62857fd0@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070504233715.62857fd0@snowflake> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: id=4E61DE84; url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l44MwVGI005780 X-Archives-Salt: 275d9802-4fbc-4143-a8a6-9cce8171a58a X-Archives-Hash: b1ad7f897ded8e81a1ffc82b2479eb98 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 05 May 2007 01:30:05 +0300 > Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> So let's say this was a message about package foobar. If it only >> affects users after they upgrade it would mean that new installs >> would get the news item too, wouldn't it?. >=20 > Yep. This situation was discussed when designing GLEP 42. There isn't a > better alternative because there's no reliable record of packages that > used to be installed. Display-If-Installed: =3D0.24. How likely is that someone has had such version previously, then uninstalled paludis completely leaving config files around, and now installs >=3D0.24? So likely it's worth that future fresh installs of say 0.50 will display this news too? - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGO7oitbrAj05h3oQRAtshAKCCJeVQ2ksDuIvX8eLGjZsxAlDxFACeNea1 Iep1M7QGhWnSfHP4drZg3rw=3D =3Dnabr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list