From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hk6yf-0000j2-RV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 May 2007 23:14:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l44NDLHS023162; Fri, 4 May 2007 23:13:21 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l44N9n85017238 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 23:09:51 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unknown [64.207.228.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EB964DA6 for ; Fri, 4 May 2007 22:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <463BB5F3.7060202@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 17:38:43 -0500 From: Steev Klimaszewski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [news-item] Paludis 0.24 References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org> <463BA9BF.4080708@digital-trauma.de> <200705042356.10789.peper@gentoo.org> <463BAFF8.80100@gentoo.org> <20070504222225.GA11120@anubis.perspektivbredband.net> In-Reply-To: <20070504222225.GA11120@anubis.perspektivbredband.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l44NDLJP023162 X-Archives-Salt: 6dfcade0-9818-4eb3-80d0-8071553144bd X-Archives-Hash: ccbe15c421c7fea5dfcf00182cd4ef94 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alexander F=E6r=F8y wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:13:12AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Isn't such use case just a replacement for elog? I thought news were >> supposed to be delivered before upgrading. Also "You should update you= r >> configuration files after upgrading." sounds like something one would >> read before upgrade... >=20 > It'll only affect users after they upgrade. >=20 Right.... which... seems to me something I would want to know *BEFORE* I upgraded... otherwise, yeah, elog does the same thing already... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGO7Xz1c+EtXTHkJcRAgPkAKCHU2QU+nFr3l+4kteNWD4mcVQ7swCfUy76 kEoMuymvLn9+kMtI7jUxnUo=3D =3D1JPW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list