From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hiy0F-000183-Lk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 19:27:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l41JQCl3026071; Tue, 1 May 2007 19:26:12 GMT Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l41JOHc1023791 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 19:24:17 GMT Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 32A12365972 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 21:24:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13735365971 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 21:24:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.0.13] (car75-2-82-224-45-203.fbx.proxad.net [82.224.45.203]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cardonar) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45FE39934 for ; Tue, 1 May 2007 21:13:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <463793E1.90203@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 21:24:17 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgQ2FyZG9uYQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] tests References: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200705011508.57220.peper@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 34fd2c61-2594-4b53-89d7-7ba0d50b7c08 X-Archives-Hash: 0c40a70eb667487661c20460cfc163a9 Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > Hello, >=20 > There was some discussion about forcing/not forcing tests in EAPI-1, bu= t there=20 > was clearly no compromise. Imho, tests are very important and thus I wa= nt to=20 > discuss them a little more, but in more sensible fashion. >=20 > Firstly each test can be(not all categories are mutually exclusive): > - not existant > - non-functional > - not runnable from ebuild > - useful but unreasonable resource-wise > - useful and reasonable resource-wise > - necessary > - known to partially fail but with a way of skipping failing tests > - known to partially fail but with no easy way of skipping failing test= s - require other and bigger deps than what the actual package requires R=C3=A9mi -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list