From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HiHQx-0005DX-FC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:59:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3TLwsKH000689; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:58:54 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3TLv3LP030939 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:57:04 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.106] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC95164C08 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <463514A9.2030405@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:56:57 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070427) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo: static/dynamic linking libraries References: <200704291032.06932.mereandor@gmail.com> <9fce88250704290154j744ae4a8v19ce701e87be0f9d@mail.gmail.com> <20070429113659.24f0af00@snowflake> <4635132C.90009@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4635132C.90009@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig41879487D11BF0CB3C37690A" X-Archives-Salt: 8e829e53-2891-4e29-8c11-665e9d53bce8 X-Archives-Hash: d1dfdc20dee0e2af6db0ee8c2cc8f0cc This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig41879487D11BF0CB3C37690A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable R=E9mi Cardona wrote: > Since I don't have any thing other than Gentoo : does anyone know how > other distros handle static libs in their -dev packages? Does anyone > care about static libs except for maybe really really low level stuff? Anyone who wants to build a static binary wants the static libs. Given the difficulty in universally enabling or disabling their builds because of build-system differences, building them and tossing them in the trash with INSTALL_MASK, as Marius suggested, seems like the best way to go. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig41879487D11BF0CB3C37690A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGNRStXVaO67S1rtsRAoT6AKDkgOb0NfiYfgjs9W5JFRnNlONJKwCgyul3 D8qHhcMQvFQ2F3rCDM2H1A0= =sK8z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig41879487D11BF0CB3C37690A-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list