From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HiEOC-0002rt-Ti for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:44:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3TIhtHZ028029; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:43:55 GMT Received: from smtp2.TU-Cottbus.De (smtp2.TU-Cottbus.De [141.43.99.248]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3TIffTt025254 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:41:41 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.TU-Cottbus.De (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3322862CF0E for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:41:39 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS (at smtp2.TU-Cottbus.De) Received: from [192.168.2.36] (pd95d570a.dip.t-dialin.net [217.93.87.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp2.TU-Cottbus.De (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8952E62CED8 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:41:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4634E7FD.6080709@subsignal.org> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:46:21 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?paul_k=F6lle?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo: static/dynamic linking libraries References: <200704291032.06932.mereandor@gmail.com> <9fce88250704290154j744ae4a8v19ce701e87be0f9d@mail.gmail.com> <20070429113659.24f0af00@snowflake> <200704291843.33718.mereandor@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200704291843.33718.mereandor@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 54297ed2-f298-47ad-83c1-e97c96d4c6eb X-Archives-Hash: f42ec6e909060ed6e53b267e32b17a36 Roman Zimmermann wrote: > So I'm with Ciaran here: It works for almost all packages and makes at least > some difference. Maybe enough to (really) give the users the choice (without > the ugly EXTRA_ECONF-hack)? I wonder why you call this an ugly hack? It seems to me everyone who wishes to avoid installing static libs is able to do so with a simple variable. Having such a feature exposed to the mainstream crowd without proper support by developers (testing and such) will not do any good. cheers Paul -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list