From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HhNqZ-0004N9-1i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:38:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3RAb8Cv001815; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:37:08 GMT Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3RAXYPD028598 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:33:34 GMT Received: from [192.168.150.87] (a91-152-108-214.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.152.108.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96FA1398FB for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:33:32 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4631D179.2000609@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:33:29 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070409) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.21 plans References: <46313C29.7050501@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <46313C29.7050501@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig530F4C8E0AF188DB99F630E8" X-Archives-Salt: aa15b71e-368f-4810-8c31-9867d55612a5 X-Archives-Hash: 5ee3edc31656e1f953dadb9592cfdb74 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig530F4C8E0AF188DB99F630E8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Daniel Drake kirjoitti: > > This means that we may be pushing for 2.6.21 stable on x86 and amd64 on= > May 17th. If important issues come up (which they may well do), this > will obviously be delayed, but do keep this date in mind. >=20 Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention that as a reason in your post. Regards, Petteri --------------enig530F4C8E0AF188DB99F630E8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGMdF8cxLzpIGCsLQRAtAOAKCSEEF5VBgSuL6b+auFji6uv1HclgCcD6XI 2Q+Ay2Du/3xU6++YocfQzE8= =nE49 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig530F4C8E0AF188DB99F630E8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list