From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgUPs-0008Cb-2m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:27:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3ONQL2s022715; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:26:21 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3ONOHNl020228 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:24:17 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.3] (koxta.net [80.55.250.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D44965190 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <462E9194.9080902@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:24:04 +0200 From: Jurek Bartuszek User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070424230559.4231dafc@maya> <462E7EF3.3070306@gentoo.org> <200704250029.00807.peper@gentoo.org> <462E906D.9020607@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <462E906D.9020607@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l3ONQL4p022715 X-Archives-Salt: d1ebaffb-c930-484a-8b0e-ced5e0b70743 X-Archives-Hash: a207d0ac8db9103d55917ddb801efdc8 Doug Goldstein wrote: > Piotr Jaroszy=F1ski wrote: >> There is no need for such a switch, just add new snapshot using the lo= ng _rc.=20 >> Once you do it you will have to keep using it until version bump, >> e.g. (low to high): >> 1.0_rc1 >> 1.0_rc000120070101 (newer snapshot of rc1) >> 1.0_rc0120070102 (leading zeroes are omitted) >> 1.0_rc000320070201 (here the date doesn't matter as long it's 8 digits= long) >> 1.1_rc1 (yuupi version bump and we can use short _rc again) >> >=20 > Where does 1.0_rc2 fall in here? >=20 That would be 1.0_rc000200000000 I suppose. Best regards, Jurek --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list