From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgTyM-0005cV-Vz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:58:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OMw2NN011626; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:58:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OMuAVe009421 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:56:11 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.3] (koxta.net [80.55.250.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EC16460E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <462E8B01.5070900@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:56:01 +0200 From: Jurek Bartuszek User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070424230559.4231dafc@maya> <462E7EF3.3070306@gentoo.org> <200704250029.00807.peper@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200704250029.00807.peper@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l3OMw2PK011626 X-Archives-Salt: 11cfe283-c639-47ca-8ede-9fbb572da39c X-Archives-Hash: f5dc54e6c5e7593add1beb51a89dbdde Piotr Jaroszy=F1ski wrote: > On Wednesday 25 of April 2007 00:04:35 Jurek Bartuszek wrote: >> Hmm, is swiching from _rc2 to _rc000200000000 trouble-free from user's >> POV too? Wouldn't he be forced to "update" from former to latter then? >> It's the same version. Or am I missing something? >=20 > There is no need for such a switch, just add new snapshot using the lon= g _rc.=20 > Once you do it you will have to keep using it until version bump, > e.g. (low to high): > 1.0_rc1 > 1.0_rc000120070101 (newer snapshot of rc1) > 1.0_rc0120070102 (leading zeroes are omitted) > 1.0_rc000320070201 (here the date doesn't matter as long it's 8 digits = long) > 1.1_rc1 (yuupi version bump and we can use short _rc again) Fine, that answers my question. Anyway, I personally still prefer double suffixes over fiddling with _rc. Best regards, Jurek --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list