From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgTDk-0000gD-4P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:10:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OM9Xhe022718; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:09:33 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OM4nZD015148 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:04:50 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.3] (koxta.net [80.55.250.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DFC64E21 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <462E7EF3.3070306@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:04:35 +0200 From: Jurek Bartuszek User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <462E6CC4.5000408@gentoo.org> <200704242320.05879.peper@gentoo.org> <200704242324.02466.peper@gentoo.org> <462E79D3.8070304@gentoo.org> <20070424230559.4231dafc@maya> In-Reply-To: <20070424230559.4231dafc@maya> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4397009b-1f9f-499f-a97d-c9382d4ef1ea X-Archives-Hash: 623320b07d8c9325d63eb9ac92a453c3 Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:42:43 +0200 > Jurek Bartuszek wrote: > >> And there you have another flaw of this system - how am I supposed to >> predict if I'll ever need the "extended" _rc versioning in case of >> that one particular package? I think that massive ebuild renaming is >> definietly not an option. > > Try reading what he wrote. You can trivially switch to the longer _rc > system; you'll just have to keep using it until the next release if you > do. Hmm, is swiching from _rc2 to _rc000200000000 trouble-free from user's POV too? Wouldn't he be forced to "update" from former to latter then? It's the same version. Or am I missing something? Best regards, Jurek -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list