From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgSJd-00058R-NJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:12:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OLBupH013080; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:11:56 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OL8xNC008922 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:09:00 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.3] (koxta.net [80.55.250.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE3165152 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 21:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <462E71E1.7000704@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:08:49 +0200 From: Jurek Bartuszek User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <200704242154.20811.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <462E6CC4.5000408@gentoo.org> <200704242311.46269.kugelfang@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200704242311.46269.kugelfang@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3f454811-9877-4378-8a0b-fab6fad436c6 X-Archives-Hash: 27a752af8c891ef53e78eb83aaf7ad90 > Existing _rcX cases can be handled like this: > > _rc2-rYYYYMMDD > > Portage will update from _rc2 to a version with revision part > 0. However, _rc2-rYYYYMMDD-r1 would *not* be valid anymore, and I think it's quite easy to imagine when this additional -r1 would be neccessary. Regards, Jurek -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list