From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgRtZ-0000r3-KX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:45:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OKiWux017627; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:44:32 GMT Received: from nameserver1.mcve.com (nameserver1.mcve.com [216.155.111.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OKeT9o011048 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:40:30 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.55] (shop.monetra.com [216.155.111.10]) by nameserver1.mcve.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718821118087 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:40:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <462E6B3D.2060907@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:40:29 -0400 From: Doug Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <462E5796.8080707@gentoo.org> <20070424203751.0eae1394@maya> <462E5F58.3080402@gentoo.org> <20070424195327.GA10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <462E61EA.5010205@gentoo.org> <20070424203307.GB10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20070424203307.GB10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l3OKiWwu017627 X-Archives-Salt: 57560d17-7cd2-48be-b456-1f787e5781c6 X-Archives-Hash: 1a3c7cc0a495aff78b96f10df80f9afa Bryan =C3=98stergaard wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:00:42PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > =20 >> Bryan =C3=98stergaard wrote: >> =20 >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: >>> =20 >>> =20 >> Bryan, >> >> You and Danny have clearly shown your bias towards paludis take over a= nd >> support of Gentoo. It's fairly poor taste to FORCE this through during= a >> non-regular meeting for something that paludis is lacking. >> >> It's AMAZING how fast you guys are to clamor and fix what you call a Q= A >> issue and other problems when we've had issues highlighted for years >> that the council can't move on. But once it's a possible issue with >> paludis you guys are quick to respond. >> >> =20 > Please stop the conspiracy theories. This has nothing to do with paludi= s > and everything to do with what we consider sane in the tree - no matter > which package manager you use. And as stated otherwise paludis already > supports multiple suffixes even if it's not in a released version yet s= o > it's not an issue for paludis either. > > Regards, > Bryan =C3=98stergaard > =20 It's not a sane tree. There have been very specific uses cases that have been discussed on ML and in #-dev that have highlighted the possible need for this. Like I said before, if you're concerned about tree QA.. There's bigger and worse things out there that have been in the wild for much longer. I expect the council to now start taking FAST action on those issues. --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list