From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hevde-00002P-7F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:07:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3KG6DEG032463; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:06:13 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3KG4GKT030131 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:04:16 GMT Received: from [10.99.0.3] (adsl-71-158-135-138.dsl.renocs.sbcglobal.net [71.158.135.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE1164E04 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4628E467.5030107@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:03:51 -0700 From: Joshua Jackson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions References: <20070419140444.6b202c3b@luna.home> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA9B981A5259358E973355558" X-Archives-Salt: d6af1e3d-61e4-47f9-8595-2b2fe25aad32 X-Archives-Hash: bcdfcb2c5d12852c63468b4aebd28da8 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA9B981A5259358E973355558 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Rob C wrote: > > > On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* > wrote: > > Steve Long >: > > > On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES=3D"collision-detect= " by > > default would do a lot more good at this stage than "test". > > Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing > keywording/stabling....in my eyes this is sufficient. > > V-Li > > > Its obviously not, Many users are reporting file-collisions on a > weekly basis. So either this isn't sufficient or the arch teams are > not acting as you describe. > > -Rob > Rob, Please watch it when saying that the arch teams are not acting as described. I can tell you that we catch what comes to us. We don't get every single package pushed on us as some never go through stable testing, and we don't have every single package installed(that's unrealistic). If they do then if there is a collision a note is filed in the bug and we wait for a fix, as it actually does bail you out of the build. This has been the mantra of at least x86 since the creation of the team. --------------enigA9B981A5259358E973355558 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGKORxSENan+PfizARAq2ZAJwNG+Z3Rlob0lQWtoKmsb2zeT3IeQCgmL0R sg0toqZB4C0XVw9u0ENpzqY= =1Oik -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA9B981A5259358E973355558-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list