From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hdu44-00056s-A7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:14:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3HKC1Nc018570; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:12:01 GMT Received: from mail.ineton.ro (mail.ineton.ro [217.156.27.7]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3HK6tBD009375 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:06:56 GMT Received: (qmail 19287 invoked by uid 210); 17 Apr 2007 23:06:55 +0300 Received: from 217.156.27.36 (mrness@217.156.27.36) by hera (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (clamdscan: 0.90/3104. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:1(217.156.27.36):. Processed in 0.026076 secs); 17 Apr 2007 20:06:55 -0000 Received: from rev-dns-36.ineton.ro (HELO ?217.156.27.36?) (mrness@217.156.27.36) by mail.ineton.ro with ESMTPA; 17 Apr 2007 23:06:55 +0300 Message-ID: <462528D5.6030805@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:06:45 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?QWxpbiBOxINzdGFj?= Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070311) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [POLICY] Keywording/Stabilizing Bug Assignment Policy References: <4625187A.4060403@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD96FC1FDD9E48BDEC7F97C72" X-Archives-Salt: e1064c73-44e3-4d83-a427-3e1360914d0e X-Archives-Hash: e0d3afb6c5b343df16be4453957f124d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD96FC1FDD9E48BDEC7F97C72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan Schweizer wrote: > In my opinion the last architecture should also remove the old ebuild > they have just made obsolete by stabling/keywording the new version, > since they commit to the directory anyway. This might be good, but also bad. I usually let the older stable version linger in our tree for an extra month or more, just to be sure I didn't inserted some horribly broken version that cannot be rolled back easily by the users. --------------enigD96FC1FDD9E48BDEC7F97C72 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGJSjaozkEeOnWD00RAsM1AJ0cvckEH0v2bcQm/VN0ReZxE6QXBwCg03xa vePzur3SElPyaEc7HEysCxQ= =6T9j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD96FC1FDD9E48BDEC7F97C72-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list