From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HcPvj-0006Mm-A4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:51:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3DHnD4M007337; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:49:13 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3DHhwBm030372 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:43:58 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607226A0743 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:43:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at top-hosting.cz Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VcEI3dlPkNfN for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:43:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (253.199.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.199.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7FA6A0742 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:43:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <461FC157.9080906@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:43:51 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070303) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: April Council meeting summary References: <200704121845.13563.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070413162734.2617f04d@snowflake> <20070413181154.118e1452@snowflake> <461FBBEE.4080904@gentoo.org> <20070413183136.61cc6b61@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070413183136.61cc6b61@snowflake> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB96C4BFC7E57280A71B30623" X-Archives-Salt: 3777df4c-16f7-4ce4-bf20-b7aa54f6a3b5 X-Archives-Hash: 91a09f9ebc054b3d49c49e7238344355 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB96C4BFC7E57280A71B30623 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:20:46 +0200 > Jakub Moc wrote: >> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): >>> If someone can provide a good reason for changing to a system that's >>> more work, I'll change. If there isn't a good reason, I won't. >> Maybe if you actually read the council log, you'd see the reason? >> yeah, it's indeed there, believe me. >=20 > I did, and I don't see it. Perhaps you'd care to paste what you think > the relevant parts are? >=20 [16:49] infra won't give any access to non-devs that needs SSH keys. Isn't that hard to find I'd say? --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enigB96C4BFC7E57280A71B30623 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGH8FXhxfV/c66PZ4RA7nKAJoDmelLb95UeK8kWpTnnf4pL6WKcACfTJ8s AkSC5TF2exP9Di5enX5GH2s= =6WCZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB96C4BFC7E57280A71B30623-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list