From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HZahS-0000Xp-2s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:45:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l35Mi1RX013611; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 22:44:01 GMT Received: from slimak.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l35MfpV5011044 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 22:41:51 GMT Received: (qmail 8833 invoked by uid 0); 5 Apr 2007 22:41:50 -0000 Received: from r141.net.upc.cz (HELO ?192.168.1.1?) (62.24.83.141) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 5 Apr 2007 22:41:50 -0000 Message-ID: <46157B2E.8060607@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 00:41:50 +0200 From: Vlastimil Babka User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070122) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <200704052240.56083.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070405212406.GA13118@seldon> <200704060016.18194.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <20070405221147.GB13118@seldon> In-Reply-To: <20070405221147.GB13118@seldon> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 OpenPGP: id=4E61DE84; url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 794abc3e-95ac-4ca2-b4d2-e285253b9681 X-Archives-Hash: 346f5d09dabcbadec814e8c74b68a8e5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Harring wrote: >>> Breaking EAPI=0 via pushing slot deps in isn't much of an option in >>> my opinion; usual "needs to have been on release media for at least 6 >> We can push for an EAPI=1 == (EAPI=0 + slot deps)... > > Can, yep, although that was originally blocked by "EAPI=0 must be > defined", which folks seem to have backed off on. Not sure if slot deps themselves could even replace version ranges hacks without also solving bug 4315 (native version ranges) in all cases. IMHO it should be possible at least to specify slot+usual version limit, to make it worth EAPI bump. > One issue with adding EAPI=1 having just slot deps is that it skips > out on some long term changes intended- default src_install for So what, longer term changes could wait for EAPI=2. Why not make experience with EAPI bumping with something smaller for a start, instead of trying to make one big bump that will bring all changes we can think of now, but will be implemented only in 2010... Now it may look like I contradict myself saying to bump ASAP but not without solving bug 4315 first. But I see slot deps without limits only half of a feature. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGFXsstbrAj05h3oQRAid6AJ4lJldHuRwA0rHdr+CwGlth6zgG5wCgixJO 7PWG4j0nMOqdyR57bMW+r3E= =Cnya -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list