From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HZUUd-0003bi-Gk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:07:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l35G64ZV023349; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:06:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l35G3kKR020546 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:03:46 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.104] (ip68-8-82-214.sd.sd.cox.net [68.8.82.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683BD64B11 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <46151DF9.40308@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:04:09 -0700 From: Josh Saddler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070309) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <20070404193643.GA7174@ubik> <20070404201717.GB25883@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <20070405092641.00676b6d@snowflake> <20070405120912.GA5025@superlupo> <20070405145119.48a89957@snowflake> <1175784457.8641.26.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20070405160049.0d958651@snowflake> <1175786542.8641.35.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1175786542.8641.35.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC0581B428934CCEE9D9CE6F6" X-Archives-Salt: 24fa3712-e53f-4e17-958d-3f04e8f20e94 X-Archives-Hash: 3e0d4718358d95853386c62794d84781 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC0581B428934CCEE9D9CE6F6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 16:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Honestly, the only reason there is any suggestion of a conspiracy is >> because of the threats being made by certain people to keep a certain >> log a secret... >=20 > The log contains information that was given to us in confidence. How > much plainer do I have to make it? We can not, and WILL NOT break that= > trust. It really is that simple. Here's how it appears to someone reading all this, though: Ciaran *already knows* what's going on, which means that some person(s) who *were* privy to those meetings have talked, plain and simple. If that's true, then the information is out one way or another, and now the Council can decide if they want to talk about it first or let someone who wasn't actually at those meetings to divulge all the details. I guess it comes down to the trust you expect the Gentoo developers who voted for you in the first place to have in you against the trust the council members have in each other. This isn't a matter of throwing someone to the wolves, but consider the rest of the trust. :) --------------enigC0581B428934CCEE9D9CE6F6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGFR385aFMlhMsVyURAgf3AJ9jyKQHg/aKyYZgGVAZ+HAjUZlkJwCgwnUv fDnbuLuF6hheLvUWV3fL/q8= =5jyV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC0581B428934CCEE9D9CE6F6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list