From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HWIDU-0005LB-Qz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:24:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2RKMqHL016422; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:22:52 GMT Received: from argo.arachnion.zzZZzz.net (argo.arachnion.zzZZzz.net [62.27.45.185]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2RKI6Ag008855 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:18:07 GMT Received: from pd953aacb.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.83.170.203]) by argo.arachnion.zzZZzz.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.42) id 1HWI7D-0008Fu-Ga for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:17:59 +0200 Message-ID: <46097BED.9090103@klever.net> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:17:49 +0200 From: Michael Krelin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070321) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703251403.38629.vapier@gentoo.org> <4606BF5C.9060304@klever.net> <200703271519.29674.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200703271519.29674.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b9f03f34-62b8-4263-b5a5-addcbc805365 X-Archives-Hash: 768c865392e0523c59669061af74aec7 >>> the werent the same question nor were they the same answer >> They weren't the same, but the second answer was definitely wrong: >>>> So is alternative package manager support something that's considered >>>> important and a priority by the Council? >>> yes >>> >>>> Did you not say that finding alternatives to Portage is one of Gentoo's >>>> >>>>> priorities? >>> no i did not, nor does that apply here >> because it explicitly states that you *did not* say it (and the wording >> doesn't differ enough to justify it), not only that it doesn't apply. > > i think the use of negatives has confused you ... the answers i posted to > ciaranm's questions in both cases are correct > > one of Gentoo's priorities is to enable alternative package managers to > coexist sanely ... it is not one of Gentoo's priorities at this time to > replace Portage with a different package manager I don't think either question implied replacing portage, but nevermind. As, I believe, I mentioned once, it's nothing but a hairsplitting. You made yourself clear enough. Love, H -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list