From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HVUjw-00041X-QG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:34:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2PFVpkT012072; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:31:51 GMT Received: from mirus.exceedtech.net (ns0.exceedtech.net [70.151.169.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2PFPCDg032064 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:25:12 GMT Received: from [4.231.95.74] (dialup-4.231.95.74.Dial1.Houston1.Level3.net [4.231.95.74]) by mirus.exceedtech.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l2PFP8v0031549 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 09:25:09 -0600 Message-ID: <46069454.5070700@exceedtech.net> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:25:08 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich> <200703250454.34744.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070325155220.6188004d@snowflake> <200703251100.00415.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070325160719.0a4d15c3@snowflake> In-Reply-To: <20070325160719.0a4d15c3@snowflake> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060003050503090008000702" X-Archives-Salt: 916aeca8-b1a3-470a-b482-bd46e880db11 X-Archives-Hash: e592d02ab30e4d7b24f6ba316c9b54d1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060003050503090008000702 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:00 -0400 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> >>> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> >>>> i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the >>>> wording is way too vague to do anything but cause confusion and >>>> people to spout long winded rants, seems like useless nitpicking >>>> about an issue that doesnt exist >>>> >>> Well, I believe one hypothetical situation which it would address >>> would be something like this: >>> >> blow your conspiracy theories somewhere else >> > > Hm? Like I said, it was a hypothetical situation. I'm not suggesting > that anything like that has ever happened, merely that Christel's idea > of protecting Gentoo from that kind of thing in the future isn't a bad > thing... > > As a lowly user, I agree. Gentoo should not put all its eggs in one basket. Dale :-) :-) :-) -- www.myspace.com/-remove-me-dalek1967 --------------060003050503090008000702 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ciaran McCreesh wrote: 
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:00:00 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
  
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
    
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
      
i dont see why this is required ?  ignoring the fact that the
wording is way too vague to do anything but cause confusion and
people to spout long winded rants, seems like useless nitpicking
about an issue that doesnt exist
        
Well, I believe one hypothetical situation which it would address
would be something like this:
      
blow your conspiracy theories somewhere else
    

Hm? Like I said, it was a hypothetical situation. I'm not suggesting
that anything like that has ever happened, merely that Christel's idea
of protecting Gentoo from that kind of thing in the future isn't a bad
thing...

As a lowly user, I agree.  Gentoo should not put all its eggs in one basket.

Dale

:-)  :-)  :-)

-- 
www.myspace.com/-remove-me-dalek1967
--------------060003050503090008000702-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list