From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HVPk1-0001VS-8L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:14:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2PADSst016062; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:13:28 GMT Received: from smtp-out2.libero.it (smtp-out2.libero.it [212.52.84.42]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2PABfvH013832 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:11:41 GMT Received: from localhost (172.31.0.43) by smtp-out2.libero.it (7.3.120) id 45D997D802460ADE for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:11:41 +0200 X-Scanned: with antispam and antivirus automated system at libero.it Received: from smtp-out3.libero.it ([172.31.0.39]) by localhost (asav-out3.libero.it [192.168.32.31]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WwLWutRtwRtR for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:11:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.6] (151.43.235.172) by smtp-out3.libero.it (7.3.120) id 45D9987102C56059 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:11:40 +0200 Message-ID: <46064AED.7070709@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:11:57 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070314) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich> In-Reply-To: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 62d1bc59-2707-4c7e-b0d8-a207e1c8a108 X-Archives-Hash: dc87b240b965396086dde6c6cc9df63f Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of > keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how > about the following addition to the Social Contract? Not necessary, if something like that happens would be easy fork away =P lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list