From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJe2L-0004pv-My for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:32:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k82MVcw0006909; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:31:38 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k82MThZd019449 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:29:43 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id p46so177262nfa for ; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 15:29:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ktn04+lWqmx/JBaCVASaeqFH3aNmPjeCicCeo1+19QUz4YMd1bayEDYmmLipyehSVytepLGcguwwLgs9NRXUMv0DdGi+fw/QEIoDnDLRVU5eBXwBUbR1KIF+hr7X9fSnxLS7GU29KGy+3pEER5ZrfYi4a1xiBu5M3O2FL+UsAIw= Received: by 10.48.48.15 with SMTP id v15mr4792491nfv; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 15:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.204.8 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 15:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46059ce10609021529q2ccf2db0k22666f295f287824@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 18:29:42 -0400 From: "Dan Meltzer" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44F95E3E.9000708@gentoo.org> <44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org> <44F96881.90806@gentoo.org> <44F98E43.5040307@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: eb44c175-dfce-4fc8-b897-a15015274beb X-Archives-Hash: 705a0d9d09d29f27206d2fed27697964 On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert wrote: > On 9/2/06, Alec Warner wrote: > > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;) > > I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users. Is it a bad thing to be saying to your developers? > > We didn't need 3000 more developers ... we just needed to give the > developers we have more reasonable notice. > > This is the second time in recent weeks that we've acted like this, by > stabilising a major package with little or no notice. It's the same > group of folks involved both times. The gcc-4.1 stabilization bug has been open for a month and a half. Thats fairly good notice... Warnings have also appeared on planet.gentoo.org, and in the GWN. > > Best regards, > Stu > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list