From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1FECvK-00001i-Gl
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:02:26 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1SLw7vA020941;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:58:07 GMT
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1SLtCam025136
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:55:13 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so1206156wra
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:55:52 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=FAYcQ+7ybgVjCG1Mj51ygHI2B6oK/4yIYfDmClAENnN3LUqnGCeUCDsUqCdcM2om2liQIiwu8aOmskGvSESh7CFVeZi39xSh1c1msQc2ErJoPDQZC+50l2V1H54MCIZ2V+/Xw6F4M76bwjWzVHBppqVAqmNf0KoS8Sq3z/EFH5M=
Received: by 10.54.71.13 with SMTP id t13mr1150511wra;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.116.13 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <46059ce10602281355i416ba449i7776fd79a4fa8041@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:55:52 -0500
From: "Dan Meltzer" <parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
In-Reply-To: <20060228215040.GL11818@toucan.gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060227213321.7ee405ec@snowdrop.home>
<200602281539.43661.vapier@gentoo.org>
<905929917.20060228220239@gentoo.org>
<200602281631.37594.vapier@gentoo.org>
<20060228215040.GL11818@toucan.gentoo.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k1SLtCam025136
X-Archives-Salt: 03047028-5288-466e-8727-7cefbb1efdf2
X-Archives-Hash: 79ebff81b48cc16c1f935982bde20fa3
On 2/28/06, Renat Lumpau <rl03@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:31:37PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > today's lesson: proactive QA is frowned upon, it's only a bug when a user
> > files a report at bugs.gentoo.org
>
> I don't think that's the lesson. It oughtta be: we need a way to figure out
> which QA issues are important and which are less so. A QA team member's opinion
> (personal attacks, whatever) should be an important input but not the final say.
eh, see, from what I can tell you are just deciding to make it complicated.
Do a quick bugzie search for bugs reported in the last week by
ciaranm, I don't think he's singling you out. I think he's responding
to your stubbornness.
>
> --
> Renat Lumpau all things web-apps
> C6A838DA 04AF B5EE 17CB 1000 DDA5 D3FC 1338 ADC2 C6A8 38DA
> America - land of the free*
> *Void where prohibited, restrictions apply. Cash value 1/100c.
>
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list