From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EqGSn-0002Sa-U7
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:58:02 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBOKvHPv016633;
	Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:57:17 GMT
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBOKtQ69015210
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:55:27 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so786289wra
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:55:26 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Re4zrFk9RbJGstLp2UJYh9VcwoWe8YGTLwbLcGnPhYxJr9UTEiodeVCU9pFNL4h6lKwD4W53d56SO9kH3+Xr71HUkwwCxpndb1xtiafpFRazff2GsVOn+ZS4Q+x29ZkCAPRRPDFRNSLojhvTtL9kTwpGnDqwpCtzTzmVO5/O208=
Received: by 10.54.140.20 with SMTP id n20mr4195294wrd;
        Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.116.6 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <46059ce10512241255w346a1800t5051a3e97c54da@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:55:25 -0500
From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: how to contribute to use/slot deps: was Re: [gentoo-dev] Multiple Repo Support
In-Reply-To: <43ADB3B7.1080707@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <43A235AD.6030604@leetworks.com>
	 <200512240337.38188.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
	 <1135370733.1873.10.camel@Darkmere.darkmere>
	 <200512241240.35292.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
	 <20051224075636.GG5796@nightcrawler.e-centre.net>
	 <20051224173306.68fa6968@snowdrop.home>
	 <46059ce10512240958n2989051ep4360e8f64b53a4e2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <43ADB3B7.1080707@gentoo.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jBOKtQ69015210
X-Archives-Salt: e462f770-e060-4ec1-906f-a743337c2d14
X-Archives-Hash: 2fda891c3340a1b31e6204a414061813

On 12/24/05, Curtis Napier <curtis119@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > On 12/24/05, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:56:37 -0800 Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org>
> >>wrote:
> >>| It's really pretty simple- get off your butt and chip in if you want
> >>| it, else you're on _our_ timeline (eg, we implement it when we deem
> >>| it sane/ready to go).
> >>
> >>Is Portage development done to support the needs of those of us who
> >>provide the tree, or is the tree expected to be restricted to whatever
> >>Portage developers feel like implementing?
> >
> >
> > I'd say the latter.
> >
> > The tree is restricted to what is implemented in portage, and as it is
> > a volunteer organization, what is implemented is what the portage
> > dev's feel like implementing.
> >
> > If you want more to be implemented, submit patches.
> >
>
> hmmmmmmm, from reading the emails, bug reports and irc chats of portage
> devs, non-portage devs and end users I would say it's a little bit of
> both. The non-portage devs are using a tool provided by the portage devs
> that allows them to create the Gentoo distro. Those two teams work
> together to ensure the best possible tool. If the portage devs ONLY did
> what they felt like (or the opposite, only did what the other devs told
> them and ignored their own intimate knowledge of portage) then portage
> would not be where it is today. True developement is a subtle play of
> ideas back and forth between everyone involved resulting in an excellent
> piece of software.
>
<snip>

For the most part, yes.

However, following these same lists, one notices ciaranm always taking
potshots at the portage team, yet never contributing anything useful.
So my previous response was directed primarily at him.

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list