From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1Em04P-0001hp-Dr
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:39:13 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBD2c3BX004286;
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:38:03 GMT
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBD2ZetN018094
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:35:41 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1961308wri
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:35:40 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=CeaNOOhb2WQCRJbXabLTLPgvTF3tYEMcantEiYTSqMyw3mnT7tIdp+OTXV3dd+4wd8R2qEQeXam1KTSRd6GiNG9Ygjv6Oy3HC/edB9WiGTqiyBjs9qc3WR+lsisc9oy/TrYyG50m3C2yDcWW2kKkr+DTgQV8xf4ZgTdFFP5vRSU=
Received: by 10.54.116.8 with SMTP id o8mr433691wrc;
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:35:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.116.6 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:35:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <46059ce10512121835t64da3c71pb1155de7f098058c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:35:40 -0500
From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process
In-Reply-To: <20051213022442.537298bd@snowdrop.home>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200512131106.54567.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
<200512131115.43287.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
<20051213022442.537298bd@snowdrop.home>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jBD2ZetN018094
X-Archives-Salt: 36e9ec43-80e1-4065-adff-56416069d206
X-Archives-Hash: 1ad6f442fcfae02d24b00b59b68deb00
If everyone but infra was in favor of glep 41, are you saying it
should be approved?
</devils advocate>
On 12/12/05, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:43 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> | A GLEP should list whom has been solicited and provide evidence that
> | each has given their explicit approval of the GLEP. A GLEP without
> | explicit approval of all teams involved cannot receive managerial
> | approval.
>
> So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP saying
> "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure said
> documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group were in
> favour, and the developer community in general were in favour, and the
> council were in favour, and the people proposed by the GLEP to manage
> the new documentation were in favour, but the existing owners of the
> developer documentation were not, you're saying that it shouldn't be
> approved?
>
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
> Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
> Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
>
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list