From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Em04P-0001hp-Dr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:39:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBD2c3BX004286; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:38:03 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBD2ZetN018094 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:35:41 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1961308wri for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:35:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CeaNOOhb2WQCRJbXabLTLPgvTF3tYEMcantEiYTSqMyw3mnT7tIdp+OTXV3dd+4wd8R2qEQeXam1KTSRd6GiNG9Ygjv6Oy3HC/edB9WiGTqiyBjs9qc3WR+lsisc9oy/TrYyG50m3C2yDcWW2kKkr+DTgQV8xf4ZgTdFFP5vRSU= Received: by 10.54.116.8 with SMTP id o8mr433691wrc; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:35:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.116.6 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:35:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <46059ce10512121835t64da3c71pb1155de7f098058c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:35:40 -0500 From: Dan Meltzer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP XX: Fix the GLEP process In-Reply-To: <20051213022442.537298bd@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline References: <200512131106.54567.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <200512131115.43287.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <20051213022442.537298bd@snowdrop.home> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jBD2ZetN018094 X-Archives-Salt: 36e9ec43-80e1-4065-adff-56416069d206 X-Archives-Hash: 1ad6f442fcfae02d24b00b59b68deb00 If everyone but infra was in favor of glep 41, are you saying it should be approved? On 12/12/05, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:15:43 +0900 Jason Stubbs > wrote: > | A GLEP should list whom has been solicited and provide evidence that > | each has given their explicit approval of the GLEP. A GLEP without > | explicit approval of all teams involved cannot receive managerial > | approval. > > So... If, hypothetically speaking, someone were to write a GLEP saying > "move developer documentation into the QA group, restructure said > documentation to this new format etc etc", and the QA group were in > favour, and the developer community in general were in favour, and the > council were in favour, and the people proposed by the GLEP to manage > the new documentation were in favour, but the existing owners of the > developer documentation were not, you're saying that it shouldn't be > approved? > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) > Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org > Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm > > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list