From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ef004-0000C0-Ma
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:09:49 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jANJ97M4028495;
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:09:07 GMT
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jANJ7FUj030624
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:07:16 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so913688wra
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:07:15 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=aE9HMktehRXtLWuXTN+bXvOjlzHe98oCXlNSSqw2BD2ThBWOOdTPhvtbMsdL3vICEsyxR9b44tWOngLfTILqCNR7qB6cYcmaxTdG6o/0CWamwhQFyAtQfCk0CqQQssfk9MlS5sQaqt9+qRV6Biv2r4ZgSvPkihfY4I8qXvI2nLI=
Received: by 10.54.101.20 with SMTP id y20mr3263535wrb;
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:07:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.110.15 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:07:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <46059ce10511231107r55dfa1e4p1906dd95cca29b46@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:07:15 -0500
From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Possible solution: email subdomain
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.11.23.18.47.17.856811@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost>
<200511211119.17618.pauldv@gentoo.org>
<20051123002605.174c3fc8@sven.genone.homeip.net>
<pan.2005.11.23.10.39.08.119682@cox.net>
<20051123154049.6b5af84c@sven.genone.homeip.net>
<pan.2005.11.23.18.47.17.856811@cox.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jANJ7FUj030624
X-Archives-Salt: 38d52870-f601-4e46-bc18-e1f32e979e70
X-Archives-Hash: 45ab6f13ca86736e9cf43f78e4b9ed8d
On 11/23/05, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> Marius Mauch posted <20051123154049.6b5af84c@sven.genone.homeip.net>,
> excerpted below, on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:40:49 +0100:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:39:08 -0700
> > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Here's the proposal again. If there's an issue with it, shoot it down,
> >> but from here, it certainly seems to fit the bill. Again, I'd /love/ to
> >> say I was the one that came up with it, but I wasn't.
> >> =8^)
> >>
> >> * give [AH]Ts a <name>.tester@gentoo.org address.
> >>
> >> - It's not a subdomain, so the existing infrastructure should have no
> >> problems with it.
> >>
> >> - testername.tester@gentoo.org remains distinctive enough it should
> >> alleviate any doubts or confusion over status.
> >>
> > Has the same problem as a subdomain as it creates two "classes" of devs.
> > So it would solve the potential technical problems, but we still have the
> > semantic issues.
>
> Viewpoint seen, and thanks for posting it. However, the proposed solution
> still appears from here to fit the bill, because...
>
> - The folks to whom it will apply are /not/ full devs, as they haven't
> gone thru the dev process, so it's not creating two classes of devs, but
> rather creating a distinction between devs and this not-dev class.
Can we get all current developers renamed to nick.developer then? just
to alleiviate any confusion someone may have...
[snip a buttload or two]
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list