From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ef004-0000C0-Ma for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:09:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jANJ97M4028495; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:09:07 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jANJ7FUj030624 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 19:07:16 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so913688wra for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:07:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aE9HMktehRXtLWuXTN+bXvOjlzHe98oCXlNSSqw2BD2ThBWOOdTPhvtbMsdL3vICEsyxR9b44tWOngLfTILqCNR7qB6cYcmaxTdG6o/0CWamwhQFyAtQfCk0CqQQssfk9MlS5sQaqt9+qRV6Biv2r4ZgSvPkihfY4I8qXvI2nLI= Received: by 10.54.101.20 with SMTP id y20mr3263535wrb; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:07:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.110.15 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:07:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <46059ce10511231107r55dfa1e4p1906dd95cca29b46@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:07:15 -0500 From: Dan Meltzer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Possible solution: email subdomain In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <200511211119.17618.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20051123002605.174c3fc8@sven.genone.homeip.net> <20051123154049.6b5af84c@sven.genone.homeip.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jANJ7FUj030624 X-Archives-Salt: 38d52870-f601-4e46-bc18-e1f32e979e70 X-Archives-Hash: 45ab6f13ca86736e9cf43f78e4b9ed8d On 11/23/05, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Marius Mauch posted <20051123154049.6b5af84c@sven.genone.homeip.net>, > excerpted below, on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:40:49 +0100: > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:39:08 -0700 > > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > > > >> Here's the proposal again. If there's an issue with it, shoot it down, > >> but from here, it certainly seems to fit the bill. Again, I'd /love/ to > >> say I was the one that came up with it, but I wasn't. > >> =8^) > >> > >> * give [AH]Ts a .tester@gentoo.org address. > >> > >> - It's not a subdomain, so the existing infrastructure should have no > >> problems with it. > >> > >> - testername.tester@gentoo.org remains distinctive enough it should > >> alleviate any doubts or confusion over status. > >> > > Has the same problem as a subdomain as it creates two "classes" of devs. > > So it would solve the potential technical problems, but we still have the > > semantic issues. > > Viewpoint seen, and thanks for posting it. However, the proposed solution > still appears from here to fit the bill, because... > > - The folks to whom it will apply are /not/ full devs, as they haven't > gone thru the dev process, so it's not creating two classes of devs, but > rather creating a distinction between devs and this not-dev class. Can we get all current developers renamed to nick.developer then? just to alleiviate any confusion someone may have... [snip a buttload or two] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list