Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Possible solution: email subdomain

[Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com>]

On 11/23/05, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> Marius Mauch posted <20051123154049.6b5af84c@sven.genone.homeip.net>,
> excerpted below,  on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:40:49 +0100:
>
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:39:08 -0700
> > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Here's the proposal again.  If there's an issue with it, shoot it down,
> >> but from here, it certainly seems to fit the bill.  Again, I'd /love/ to
> >> say I was the one that came up with it, but I wasn't.
> >> =8^)
> >>
> >> * give [AH]Ts a <name>.tester@gentoo.org address.
> >>
> >> - It's not a subdomain, so the existing infrastructure should have no
> >> problems with it.
> >>
> >> - testername.tester@gentoo.org remains distinctive enough it should
> >> alleviate any doubts or confusion over status.
> >>
> > Has the same problem as a subdomain as it creates two "classes" of devs.
> > So it would solve the potential technical problems, but we still have the
> > semantic issues.
>
> Viewpoint seen, and thanks for posting it.  However, the proposed solution
> still appears from here to fit the bill, because...
>
> - The folks to whom it will apply are /not/ full devs, as they haven't
> gone thru the dev process, so it's not creating two classes of devs, but
> rather creating a distinction between devs and this not-dev class.

Can we get all current developers renamed to nick.developer then? just
to alleiviate any confusion someone may have...

[snip a buttload or two]

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list