From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdbkU-00069e-Oq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:03:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJN2p9h020041; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:02:51 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJMxlkx015222 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:59:47 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so252903wri for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:59:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=J5KBUb+8FfqnGnX9H2HX5YXl/C/ioDdj71VocZYDOBQHF6lINiZsOzJO5JM4TeW+Ax4Xycp14xXSbXAg2/g3AAdYvHSdZvW1xeUmtBerSdwOg8WPvaujNlIOFZcFOchIVDczIvVIlTCsVWlDX8HAZNocxkjfv5jJ4Oc7SJGD2w8= Received: by 10.54.93.10 with SMTP id q10mr398092wrb; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:59:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.110.15 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:59:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <46059ce10511191459i1f5df5b4q8fcbd9ae2ad2b401@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:59:46 -0500 From: Dan Meltzer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 In-Reply-To: <20051119225650.GE12982@mail.lieber.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119224241.GC12982@mail.lieber.org> <46059ce10511191444u26638588qbba94f158c19327e@mail.gmail.com> <20051119225650.GE12982@mail.lieber.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jAJMxlkx015222 X-Archives-Salt: 372e5c7e-2623-459f-9f43-0b58e627b11a X-Archives-Hash: 820be1122f3fb9f416c86205ce1322e9 Sorry for two mails in a row.. but out of curiosity, instead of using 30 minute rsync, why not 30 minute mirror of cvs? KDE does this fairly well, they even have it something like every 5 minutes, is there any reason mirrored cvs is not possible//feasible? is this something svn has gotten better at? On 11/19/05, Kurt Lieber wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:44:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dan Meltzer wrote: > > Funy, I was just pondering that myself... is authenticated rsync > > really possible? > > Yes, it has its own auth mechanism. We actually use it for some automated > cron jobs that we have. > > > The only downside to this that I can see would be the lack of > > history... FEX an upgraded -rX ebuild breaks something, I could test > > against previous -rX's in turn to find out exactly which broke it, and > > other history like stuff. This may or may not be necessary/helpful, > > hard to say without it having happened :) > > So, can other arch testers please pitch in with their $.02? If we gave you > rsync instead of CVS, would that be sufficient? Or do you need the > revision history, etc. of CVS? > > And, any objections to a ~30 minute delay between CVS<->this solution? > > --kurt > > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list