From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Edbgl-0003fj-6m
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:00:07 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJMxI12005000;
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:59:18 GMT
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJMvZ7f000571
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:57:36 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so252735wri
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:57:35 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=NPMKNQKrjCyF6StWyfxO29t8sJBnqPBvz+Lp6IrK161iLcx97PSVM6HpkR8HhP4t5I31DW8cw8ApeLWpfjiNQHU6D4kuKKygMM6h8jT9pHwySM6lS2dzxWDQlb94jplL+skTQBTErVsa/p75vOpB5GhdFet4uueIyauIYNDO5/o=
Received: by 10.54.114.20 with SMTP id m20mr108345wrc;
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.110.15 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:57:35 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <46059ce10511191457q296f2577n986ca49bd1f9a78d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:57:35 -0500
From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41
In-Reply-To: <20051119225650.GE12982@mail.lieber.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org>
<20051119224241.GC12982@mail.lieber.org>
<46059ce10511191444u26638588qbba94f158c19327e@mail.gmail.com>
<20051119225650.GE12982@mail.lieber.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jAJMvZ7f000571
X-Archives-Salt: d3637849-9f32-42b0-aa3d-06cc53b948fb
X-Archives-Hash: 63cc04797384e2273c24410223ba934e
On 11/19/05, Kurt Lieber <klieber@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:44:41PM -0500 or thereabouts, Dan Meltzer wrote:
> > Funy, I was just pondering that myself... is authenticated rsync
> > really possible?
>
> Yes, it has its own auth mechanism. We actually use it for some automated
> cron jobs that we have.
>
> > The only downside to this that I can see would be the lack of
> > history... FEX an upgraded -rX ebuild breaks something, I could test
> > against previous -rX's in turn to find out exactly which broke it, and
> > other history like stuff. This may or may not be necessary/helpful,
> > hard to say without it having happened :)
>
> So, can other arch testers please pitch in with their $.02? If we gave you
> rsync instead of CVS, would that be sufficient? Or do you need the
> revision history, etc. of CVS?
>
> And, any objections to a ~30 minute delay between CVS<->this solution?
30 minutes is much better than 24 hours :)
>
> --kurt
>
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list