From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EY9Eb-0004Oq-Rk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 21:36:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA4LZkG7032219; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:35:46 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA4LXxaI030127 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:33:59 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i24so524086wra for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:33:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k+tcqj+eCTeWNqQohj+ASnHwx9yvEy/a6L1irnSBD04mMAFmJwmNQ7IJUoXwpwIGkjITN17/N6u6UHHLhHpk3hFr4BG7883XG6rusgvNiWn2b8bt1cFacBm+l6WQvEL+xc2OT6s4EreYKWq0x9CX0fnPBrz6y1e+cUV5IQZpOl8= Received: by 10.54.145.19 with SMTP id s19mr2076219wrd; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 13:33:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.110.20 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:33:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <46059ce10511041333l1fc0eb4fyfc42f022ab98021@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:33:56 -0500 From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting In-Reply-To: <200511042230.40697.jkt@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051101015125.1cc45eb4@snowdrop.home> <436B6F94.4060205@gentoo.org> <20051104183922.699f3dc0@snowdrop.home> <200511042230.40697.jkt@gentoo.org> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jA4LXxaI030127 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id jA4LZkHh032219 X-Archives-Salt: 96b9c59e-56c5-4ef4-9b47-241de8d01f57 X-Archives-Hash: 42d2bb1b216c7d1c114b91bc40196a7b For simple translations? No. For translations that span the same bredth (old version checking is probably going to be fairly needed if we used xml as a main version, and all other pretifying stuff is necessary. On 11/4/05, Jan Kundr=C3=A1t <jkt@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Friday 04 of November 2005 19:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:26:28 +0100 Xavier Neys <neysx@gentoo.org> wro= te: > > | > Oh? Our GuideXML to HTML conversion is thousands of lines of code= ... > > | > > | Plain wrong, but you have always made it clear that you are not onl= y > > | biased against XML for anything, but also very much XML challenged. > > > > Run a wc -l on guide.xsl sometime. Either wc is lying or that alone i= s > > thousands of lines of code. > > Run a `less` or `gvim` or anything which actually displays the contents= of the > file. Are you sure that checking for obsoleted translations, highlighti= ng > top-page links and other stuff is really required for simple transforma= tions? > > WKR, > -jkt > > -- > cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth > > > --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list