From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1E7Bkg-0007lh-Ic
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:50:10 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7MClPQW012685;
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:47:25 GMT
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7MChRXg022519
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:43:28 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i23so1330218wra
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 05:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=HrYheBQ9B5RsSx161Qtnh8w2dvvjoxej7z6fwsCjwoYptlOJt+duHtMXEi9DfdEb0VTlwzVWfn38dwNuVFUDBI8GJAT6LiPVDXxBpRBLX2ZLsU0HeRPxgWdPrE0OSm9rgIf6fttHeRU3hzPa1RiJLyOA+rf65DSf3TCxf3Wqk80=
Received: by 10.54.100.20 with SMTP id x20mr3776266wrb;
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 05:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.111.17 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 05:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46059ce1050822054479d23216@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:44:04 -0400
From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fixing the TERM mess
In-Reply-To: <7C3236ADA8D6B69461A1FF62@10.0.0.1>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050821220505.4efbaff2@snowdrop.home>
<1124661626.13706.13.camel@sponge.fungus>
<20050821231356.050432ce@snowdrop.home>
<46059ce1050821154310568d72@mail.gmail.com>
<20050822000800.7c366b4f@snowdrop.home>
<20050822002116.GA5503@toucan.gentoo.org>
<605B5D3B660EFCD90AD3B473@10.0.0.1>
<7C3236ADA8D6B69461A1FF62@10.0.0.1>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j7MChRXg022519
X-Archives-Salt: bf10c20d-96ac-4caf-b91b-d66bbabd258e
X-Archives-Hash: 1003d125c1f4f0966c799c9060217e21
mine ended up spitting out large amounts of gibberish.... and ruining
the readability of the terminal... why would it be so different?
On 8/22/05, Tavis Ormandy <taviso@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>
> --On Monday, August 22, 2005 08:18:42 +0100 Tavis Ormandy
> <taviso@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --On Monday, August 22, 2005 00:21:16 +0000 Renat Lumpau
> <rl03@gentoo.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:08:00AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >>> Thanks. The other useful one is to see whether it does 256 colours
> >>> properly like real xterm does. The following bash script, when run with
> >>> '256' as its argument, should look the same as it does when run under
> >>> a real xterm.
> >>
> >> Not even close here.
> >
> > Your script produces 256 different colours here, the shades dont match
> > xterm's exactly, but there are definitely 256 distinct colours.
>
> <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/256-colours-match-xterm.html>
>
> Ahh, apparently it matches an old version, but they plan to update it.
>
> Tavis.
>
> --
> -------------------------------------
> taviso@sdf.lonestar.org | finger me for my gpg key.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list