From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H36kH-0007mZ-LQ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 08:17:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l068Gl8E003334; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:16:47 GMT Received: from spunkymail-a5.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-83.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l068Ex1w009151 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 08:14:59 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.103] (c-68-43-193-90.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.43.193.90]) by spunkymail-a5.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABA614D6AB for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 00:14:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <459F5AB9.3090002@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 03:15:53 -0500 From: Alec Warner Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061225) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] PORTAGE_BINHOST Madness References: <459DAAD8.7090508@gentoo.org> <200701042054.47065.vapier@gentoo.org> <459DDEF0.2000206@gentoo.org> <459F06D1.5070601@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <459F06D1.5070601@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 31d857f8-692b-45ba-882a-c38965bce799 X-Archives-Hash: 17403a584cac48bbeef54df97be44cfc Gustavo Felisberto wrote: > My main issue is with size. Right now portage has to pull ALL the packages in > the PORTAGE_BINHOST to create the dep tree. Is there a way for me to say: > > emerge -u --use-bynary-packages-if-possible system and portage will build the > dep tree based on the local portage tree, then it will try to fetch the updated > packages and see if the deps are ok. > meh..You want to build a depgraph on local ebuilds, and then try to find matching binpkgs after the fact? I'd imagine you'd have a lot of trouble finding matching packages, tbh :) Ebuilds in the tree will get updated, or your local USE flags will change; your binary packages won't match in either case here, because the tree has a more up to date package or a package with correct flags. Thats why the binary repo is used for the deptree generation. Talk to solar about binhost, I know he has a better implementation lying around; it's a matter of finalizing it ;) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list