From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H2hSI-0007xk-KE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 05:17:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l055GX3c006161; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 05:16:33 GMT Received: from spunkymail-a5.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-81.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l055EbdO025243 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 05:14:37 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.103] (c-68-43-193-90.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.43.193.90]) by spunkymail-a5.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3076E14D6B3 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:14:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <459DDEF0.2000206@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:15:28 -0500 From: Alec Warner Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061225) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] PORTAGE_BINHOST Madness References: <459DAAD8.7090508@gentoo.org> <200701042054.47065.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200701042054.47065.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5b9adca6-b9d9-47b2-b0ff-4bc86d12b66b X-Archives-Hash: 171b10f666ef10e3c51fe7a78daf085d Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 04 January 2007 20:33, Gustavo Felisberto wrote: >> Ok, so what is diference? > > probably the samething as between -k and -K > -mike A more verbose answer: -k says "use binary packages if possible, otherwise use ebuilds" -K says "use only binary packages, fail if you can't create a depgraph" -g says "use remote binary packages if possible, otherwise use ebuilds" -G says "only use remove binary packages, fail if you can't create a depgraph" I'd have to double check -g to make sure ebuilds are the fallback; you may be able to do something like emerge -g -k but in this case I'm pretty sure the remote binrepo will 'shadow' the local one, I'd have to ask Zac to be sure ;) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list