From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1H1YRj-0001b4-7j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 01:28:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l021RGBL000398; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 01:27:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l021O77f024862 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 01:24:07 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.106] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE10164B0D for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 01:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4599B433.107@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:24:03 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1 (X11/20061222) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: making USE_EXPANDed variables incremental References: <20070101211247.730788c9@maya> <45997C21.4000001@gentoo.org> <20070101224949.23e52440@maya> <459998EF.3000101@gentoo.org> <20070101234750.2198432e@maya> In-Reply-To: <20070101234750.2198432e@maya> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig98151E3E2C9E9D4BEB43B8F7" X-Archives-Salt: 23f64911-2f2e-4b9b-82d2-09e7069379da X-Archives-Hash: 21eab152a6cbcd57fbd8a482db464f56 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig98151E3E2C9E9D4BEB43B8F7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stephen Bennett wrote: > The proposal means that all variables listed in USE_EXPAND get handled > exactly as USE does where profile inheritance is concerned. Subprofiles= > can add to and remove from the value in the parent profile just as they= > can for USE. Did I misread what you said earlier? Stephen Bennett wrote: > At present, > from what zmedico told me, it's handled in a weird manner which > essentially does half the job, letting you add flags but not remove > them in subprofiles. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig98151E3E2C9E9D4BEB43B8F7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFmbQ1XVaO67S1rtsRAlZvAKCD02N0zS/toJ7cIDv9iIIG+YYKOQCg6dHi l2XpYUj2WGqeNz+mlTIVrRA= =tKbv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig98151E3E2C9E9D4BEB43B8F7-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list