From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GnUjC-0001U5-N1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:40:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAO6dFEK020277; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:39:15 GMT Received: from mtai05.charter.net (mtai05.charter.net [209.225.8.185]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAO6bOX0003245 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 06:37:24 GMT Received: from aa04.charter.net ([10.20.200.156]) by mtai05.charter.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061124063723.PGYJ23380.mtai05.charter.net@aa04.charter.net> for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:37:23 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.106] (really [71.80.182.211]) by aa04.charter.net with ESMTP id <20061124063723.TOUK11167.aa04.charter.net@[192.168.0.106]> for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:37:23 -0500 Message-ID: <4566931B.9030505@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 22:37:15 -0800 From: David Shakaryan User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061116) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml References: <4566779C.1060805@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4566779C.1060805@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig31B57607AE3B165FFB2276B4" X-Chzlrs: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 67591f25-74cf-422e-905a-bbcc5a7eb5f7 X-Archives-Hash: dd5d1f994d73f58a395b9702dd92175e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig31B57607AE3B165FFB2276B4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Christian Faulhammer wrote: >> Nice idea, but you should really add no-herd as this >> is required if there is only a "maintainer". >=20 > Really? isn't valid? I'd rather see that than adding a "fake" h= erd. Neither are valid from what I understand. IIRC, kloeri said that every package should belong to a herd. --=20 David Shakaryan GnuPG Public Key: 0x4B8FE14B --------------enig31B57607AE3B165FFB2276B4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFZpMivSApE0uP4UsRAiJCAJ98iYw7cH1eOoxiWMx3v7vcXZg0ZgCfUmOS FFPZNiiJBEDGCwJXjtckHBY= =0O5/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig31B57607AE3B165FFB2276B4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list