From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GnStW-00016t-Vf for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:42:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAO4fkjI028548; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:41:46 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kAO4dx1l023657 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:40:00 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.106] (c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.150.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C93646E8 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 04:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4566779C.1060805@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:39:56 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061109) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: missing metadata.xml References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 86de240e-ade8-4f1d-ab2f-b806d543d008 X-Archives-Hash: 84f5387586b1d3c1cfd6da17b08a09f2 Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Tach Steve, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) > > Steve Dibb schrieb: >> There are more than a few packages with missing metadata.xml in the >> portage tree. I've setup my funky little QA website to report on which >> ones fall in that category, and here is the list right here: > > Nice idea, but you should really add no-herd as this is > required if there is only a "maintainer". Really? isn't valid? I'd rather see that than adding a "fake" herd. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list