From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhCbK-0007Rq-QI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:05:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA6M4tRE017797; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:04:55 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA6M0CK7015029 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:00:12 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8952534DE6 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:00:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19782-06-2 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:00:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [88.103.51.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2275359DA for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:59:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <454FBF2D.9010009@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:03:09 +0100 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061014) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <1162841820.10506.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <454FB05F.9050709@gentoo.org> <200611061643.25418.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200611061643.25418.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE1E4F822974BF475C46B9492" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.264 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.524, BAYES_20=-0.74] X-Spam-Score: -1.264 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 51a1a9c3-4baa-4419-a646-5e89b691164c X-Archives-Hash: 8b34d164f87aafe573d07a16e83fb7e0 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE1E4F822974BF475C46B9492 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger napsal(a): >> No. Not because I didn't like the answer - because I haven't seen a >> *single* argument *in favour* of using the IMHO completely broken SPF >> thing. >=20 > so what are you looking for ? us to regurgitate the entire SPF argumen= t over=20 > again ? No. I expect you to _decide_ on the issue, considering that quite a couple of arguments were given against using it, and none was given in favour of using it. (Sorry, but "I happen to disagree" is not a valid or useful one). > infra believes using SPF helps fight spam, you guys believe SPF does no= t ...=20 > how do you expect to come to a conclusion over such a technology ? > -mike Infra didn't say anything useful, and no, they basically say that it's _not_ an antispam technology and that they'll continue to use it anyway, not subject to debate, the end... Kinda weird, hmmm? Last word on this, as it's getting really a frustrating experience. Quoting your own monthly email: If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Well folks, if you outright refuse to discuss/decide on stuff that people are asking you to discuss/decide on, then please drop the above from your email. I'll reconsider if it's worth wasting the bandwidth to vote for anyone next time. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enigE1E4F822974BF475C46B9492 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFT78yhxfV/c66PZ4RA5NBAJ41qIDdhAwRwfbWslmJtxo/ld1tlACgs/eu gZj37nNXt/Q/Sg6YjHj648s= =6hnt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE1E4F822974BF475C46B9492-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list