From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhBjU-0006de-Me for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:10:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA6L8bBE005359; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:08:37 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA6L60o5003471 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:06:01 GMT Received: from [35.9.22.159] (cse498t10c.cse.msu.edu [35.9.22.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kA6L5wUm012107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 16:06:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <454FB1B6.7000006@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:05:42 -0500 From: Alec Warner User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611050530.43128.vapier@gentoo.org> <454DBF5F.50408@gentoo.org> <200611050545.09640.vapier@gentoo.org> <454DC709.2000905@gentoo.org> <454DDAC3.4030208@gentoo.org> <1162841820.10506.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1162841820.10506.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1b17fb3a-5303-4378-afc1-a30e19a6b496 X-Archives-Hash: f83de8b251468f1941f14a691467f32d Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 13:36 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: >> Alin Nastac napsal(a): >>> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>>> On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote: >>>> >>>>> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ? >>>>>> >>>>> It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council had >>>>> to be involved in this decision. >>>>> >>>> it isnt ... so file a bug for infra >>>> >>> done in bug 154120 . >>> >> And WONTFIXed in 15 minutes. In that case, I'd like to resubmit it to >> the council... :/ > > So because you didn't like the answer from the people responsible for > this, you'd rather go over their heads and try to bring this up to the > council, so we can override their decisions? Not bloody likely. > I actually agree with Ciaran; it is your job to decide on stuff like this (or to rightly say the issue is stupid and write it off as such). Think US Supreme Court (we will hear your case and decide on it or we will say your case is frivolous). In either case a decision from you (the council) is required. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list