From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GgfAj-0000Ua-0g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 10:24:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA5AMk7D001990; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:22:46 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA5AJLcR001252 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:19:21 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B7D535D0B for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:19:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19363-01-2 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:19:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [88.103.51.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262A3536335 for ; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 11:19:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <454DC967.2030805@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 12:22:15 +0100 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061014) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <454DB3DF.6060300@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <454DB3DF.6060300@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig26A54254C024665E8DF61DD6" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=0.420, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.179 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: e0c5f694-faf6-4e50-a4b8-aa0730e56420 X-Archives-Hash: 912104831c980950be535df6f87021ac This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig26A54254C024665E8DF61DD6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alin Nastac napsal(a): > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even >> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole >> Gentoo dev list to see. >> =20 > I have a problem with our current SPF record. I wanna see a +all in thi= s > record for 2 reasons: > a) SPF is really worthless > b) spamassassin have a SPF_NEUTRAL test, with a score bigger than 1 >=20 > See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/43707/focus=3D4370= 7 . I second this request... Thanks. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enig26A54254C024665E8DF61DD6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFTclthxfV/c66PZ4RAxjgAJ91qHhEoA3Z0PCfTGwJ4RytnUCg8QCguDOf rTWjhliHnWyoGv/WssJAyFE= =x5E/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig26A54254C024665E8DF61DD6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list