From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gffxm-0008Jy-8q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:02:46 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA2H1oba019264; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 17:01:50 GMT Received: from alpha.total-knowledge.com (alpha.total-knowledge.com [205.217.158.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA2GxU3c028849 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:59:31 GMT Received: (qmail 27519 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2006 08:59:25 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.236?) (ilya@209.157.142.202) by alpha.total-knowledge.com with ESMTPA; 2 Nov 2006 08:59:25 -0800 Message-ID: <454A23E6.30105@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:59:18 -0800 From: "Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh" Organization: Total Knowledge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees References: <454773F6.9020605@gentoo.org> <20061031163244.2ffd9201@blashyrk> <45478062.7080109@gentoo.org> <20061031170521.6b650cc9@blashyrk> <45478562.3000706@gentoo.org> <20061031173853.247a820b@blashyrk> <45478D02.3060504@gentoo.org> <20061031180004.67381de6@snowdrop.home> <4547922A.7030609@gentoo.org> <20061031184757.GA8240@ferdyx.org> <1162478425.10733.4.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> In-Reply-To: <1162478425.10733.4.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: eed54367-aae5-4df1-8fd5-ad32b2b90d02 X-Archives-Hash: a56eb51c74c3c254fb49fdc008c37c98 Michael Cummings wrote: > Not attempting to join this ruckus - but I'll meekly raise my hand and > say that'd be awesome. I have an account on a mips box, but its > connection to the internet has been unstable in recent months (which I > was warned about ahead of time - that isn't a gripe). Just FYI, there is another box, faster, and running 24x7 which should be used instead of O2K now. Ping me on IRC for more info. (Oh, and sign up for the announcements list for those boxes ;-) > As primarily an > ebuild maintainer, I have no qualms about doing the legwork in the scope > that an arch is willing to accept, I just don't have the money and space > to personally house more than a handful of machines at home. > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list