From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gezac-0005JY-44 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:48:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9VJjb5K028354; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:45:37 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9VJhMXY023023 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:43:22 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E727A7AB1 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:43:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20328-03-2 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:43:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [88.103.51.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F685336AB for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:43:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4547A73E.7050508@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:42:54 +0100 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061014) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees References: <454773F6.9020605@gentoo.org> <20061031163244.2ffd9201@blashyrk> <45478062.7080109@gentoo.org> <20061031170521.6b650cc9@blashyrk> <45478562.3000706@gentoo.org> <20061031173853.247a820b@blashyrk> <45478D02.3060504@gentoo.org> <20061031180004.67381de6@snowdrop.home> <4547922A.7030609@gentoo.org> <20061031184757.GA8240@ferdyx.org> In-Reply-To: <20061031184757.GA8240@ferdyx.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE973ED68FC25E67DEF994166" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.434 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.324, BAYES_05=-1.11] X-Spam-Score: -1.434 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 955dbbfa-eaa2-4113-af39-d2d47b2dc8d1 X-Archives-Hash: c642f0c8c2b6ab4306783c89b483fd86 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE973ED68FC25E67DEF994166 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fernando J. Pereda napsal(a): > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: >> Oh well, this apparently doesn't go anywhere, slacking is just >> wonderful, maintainers should just STFU and obey the almighty slacking= >> arches, security is the least of a concern and no priority, not >> answering a on bug for half a year makes lots of sense and all is fine= >> and dandy. More cruft in the tree for t3h win. >=20 > Yeah, we are so slackers that we are able to maintain a whole tree of > keywords with less than 10 persons and less than 10 machines (alpha > example). >=20 > You probably want a shell account on a mips/alpha/... machine so you ca= n > start helping, right? This whole frickin' debate started when vivo mentioned a bug where noone from the concerned arches gave a damn for half a year. Not even uttering a simple "we don't care, punt it" or "we have still an issue with this and are working on it". Then ciaranm came w/ his priorities junk, spb joined to fuel the flame (as always) and then you came horribly offended (for whatever weird reason) about how I'm daring to dictate some arches how they should do their job. OMG how hard is it to post one sentence on such bugs instead of playing a dead horse? Really, stop this nonsense. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enigE973ED68FC25E67DEF994166 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFR6dNhxfV/c66PZ4RA/kyAJ9+7VokmSxhx/CkHTAJL1K2XoNnYwCfafQ5 ICO/enV9+StB1fI5Vwihv5k= =Uuok -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE973ED68FC25E67DEF994166-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list