From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GeRsP-0001Ox-UJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:48:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9U7lEjj016475; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:47:14 GMT Received: from mail.pnpitalia.it (85-18-21-122.ip.fastwebnet.it [85.18.21.122]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9U7jG8f022056 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:45:16 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.pnpitalia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC55C234073 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:45:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.pnpitalia.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (db [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07987-20 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:45:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.4.153] (host-4-153.pnpitalia.it [192.168.4.153]) by mail.pnpitalia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33981234001 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:45:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4545AE99.7090004@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:49:45 +0000 From: Francesco Riosa User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060927) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.pnpitalia.it X-Archives-Salt: 2a33779f-318c-4d02-b2e8-5d588ff12ef2 X-Archives-Hash: 1141fb99abfff36f8334ae9446d139e4 Jason Wever ha scritto: > Hi All, > > Apparently its been too long since I've sent one of these out, as people > are starting to slip up and break the tree again. > > Please triple check what you want to commit and verify that you don't do > any of the following (which are punishable by death): > > 1) remove the last ebuild that is keyworded for a given arch, especially > when resulting in broken dependencies. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149626 I'm going to die then, scheduled on 2006-11-05 If keywording without archs support is only gambling I'll go that route > 2) remove the last stable ebuild for an architecture > > 3) remove the last testing ebuild for an architecture when there is no > stable ebuild available after the removal > > Consider yourself warned. Violation of any of these will cause the > jforman death goat squad to be dispatched to your location for a > discreet hit. For repeat offenders, public executions will be had, with > Spanky hosting. > > Thanks :) > -- Jason Wever > Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list