[gentoo-dev] firefox-2.0

[gentoo-dev] firefox-2.0

[Michal Kurgan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 403 bytes --]

Hello!

Recently new firefox-2.0 was released.
I (and probably many other users) am interested when this new version would
be unmasked and stabilized. If there are any problems, what are they and what
to expect if i would force installation now? Is there any roadmap or timeline
for stabilization already?

Thanks in advance for any answers.

-- 
Michal Kurgan
http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: firefox-2.0

[Ryan Hill]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 578 bytes --]

Michal Kurgan wrote:
> Recently new firefox-2.0 was released.
> I (and probably many other users) am interested when this new version would
> be unmasked and stabilized. If there are any problems, what are they and what
> to expect if i would force installation now? Is there any roadmap or timeline
> for stabilization already?

Did you try, maybe, looking in bugzilla?

-- 
                                        by design, by neglect
dirtyepic@gentoo.org            for a fact or just for effect
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: firefox-2.0

[Michal Kurgan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 187 bytes --]

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:01:50 -0600
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Did you try, maybe, looking in bugzilla?
> 

Yes.

-- 
Michal Kurgan
http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: firefox-2.0

[Caleb Cushing]

I'm using the -bin version and it seems to be working fine.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: firefox-2.0

[Nathan Sullivan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 266 bytes --]

im using it on ppc and its fine here. i think im using the beta on amd64 at
work too.

Nathan.

On 10/30/06, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm using the -bin version and it seems to be working fine.
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 597 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] firefox-2.0

[Josh Saddler]

Michal Kurgan wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Recently new firefox-2.0 was released.
> I (and probably many other users) am interested when this new version would
> be unmasked and stabilized. If there are any problems, what are they and what
> to expect if i would force installation now? Is there any roadmap or timeline
> for stabilization already?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any answers.
> 
There's no need to rush stabilization; being overly hasty leads to
broken systems. If you want it, it's in ~arch, so go get it.

Our own documentation gives a guideline of 1 month without outstanding
problems/open bugs. A quick search for "firefox 2.0" in Bugzilla shows a
few open bugs:

http://tinyurl.com/yjoy3w
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] firefox-2.0

[Caleb Cushing]

I wouldn't do it until mplayerplug-in works on it. I just realized it
doesn't, last night. lot of people would probably be upset if it were
stabilized. but they couldn't watch movies.

On 10/29/06, Josh Saddler <nightmorph@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Michal Kurgan wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Recently new firefox-2.0 was released.
> > I (and probably many other users) am interested when this new version would
> > be unmasked and stabilized. If there are any problems, what are they and what
> > to expect if i would force installation now? Is there any roadmap or timeline
> > for stabilization already?
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any answers.
> >
> There's no need to rush stabilization; being overly hasty leads to
> broken systems. If you want it, it's in ~arch, so go get it.
>
> Our own documentation gives a guideline of 1 month without outstanding
> problems/open bugs. A quick search for "firefox 2.0" in Bugzilla shows a
> few open bugs:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yjoy3w
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list