From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GVAkJ-0001S0-5W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:41:27 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k94HeSPm007770; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:40:28 GMT Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k94HcMog031782 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 17:38:23 GMT Received: from [35.9.129.93] (torx [35.9.129.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.7/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k94HcIpp001949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4523E442.8040908@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:41:38 -0400 From: Alec Warner Organization: Gentoo User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060815) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting References: <20061004064152.GW12566@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <20061004110829.38103df2@snowdrop.home> <1159957754.8221.1.camel@lotus.datanode.net> <20061004122730.68ede47f@snowdrop.home> <4523C168.70509@gentoo.org> <20061004153930.4f25d022@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20061004153930.4f25d022@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 129f9a78-04b9-44b8-8f16-fa4d9cfc4af3 X-Archives-Hash: c225b7bdddd16815f229802b2017b170 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:12:56 -0700 Josh Saddler > wrote: > | > Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the > | > logged meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain > | > private IRC channel. > | > | You're just pissy because you weren't invited to the party. > > Naah. As anyone in devrel will tell you, someone forwards me complete > logs of the private devrel IRC channel, all the email sent to the alias > and spycam footage of their orgies. > > Seriously though, devrel keeping things private probably isn't a good > idea even if they're not using said private things to plot behind > people's backs any more. Given that they've done it in the past, it > only lends credibility to people who're claiming that devrel are out to > get them for personal reasons... > Let me be the first to state "take action then" as opposed to just complaining on list. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list