From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GTe9R-0007NZ-5i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:41:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8UCeD4S008033; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:40:13 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8UCcJXg006707 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 12:38:19 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D23AA7B2D for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:38:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 09217-10 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:38:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [88.103.51.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DED535C57 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:38:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <451E6527.2040902@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:37:59 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask References: <200609300640.14616@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060930132521.106de32c@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060930132521.106de32c@snowdrop.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0E84F5744ED85F58DE3E9FE8" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.92 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.180, BAYES_20=-0.74] X-Spam-Score: -0.92 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 624e95f7-1c0b-4d8f-a1ce-533628c38f6b X-Archives-Hash: 79a574363dd56d534ff1398de124932b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0E84F5744ED85F58DE3E9FE8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:40:07 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2" > wrote: > | This is a discussion to follow up bug #149508 [1]. >=20 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D149536#c4 If I were you, I'd rather not mention that bug. Really don't see what you are trying to say here with that link. Plus kindly note > *Important: do NOT use this thread for considerations on QA behaviour, > this is NOT what this post is thought for.* in the original mail. So now if you could move to the points mentioned by Flameeyes in his email, it would be really useful. Additionally, it would be nice if these discussions involved concerned arches and were not done ex post in future cases. Thanks. --=20 Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:jakub@gentoo.org GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3= D9E ... still no signature ;) --------------enig0E84F5744ED85F58DE3E9FE8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFHmUthxfV/c66PZ4RA1hJAJ9LLKXPda9Gj3z90wtox/qH6YzHRQCfZiFw Up6SPCc8yLhhu0Qw5eIC+oA= =KByT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0E84F5744ED85F58DE3E9FE8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list