Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 06:40:07 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
> <flameeyes@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | This is a discussion to follow up bug #149508 [1].
> 
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149536#c4

If I were you, I'd rather not mention that bug. Really don't see what
you are trying to say here with that link. Plus kindly note

> *Important: do NOT use this thread for considerations on QA behaviour,
> this is NOT what this post is thought for.*

in the original mail. So now if you could move to the points mentioned
by Flameeyes in his email, it would be really useful. Additionally, it
would be nice if these discussions involved concerned arches and were
not done ex post in future cases.

Thanks.


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)