From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQmgf-0008TT-SX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:11:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8MFAdCG018872; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:10:39 GMT Received: from creativecommunications.com (creativecommunications.com [65.17.124.162]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8MF8jNa016458 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:08:45 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by creativecommunications.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCF768C270 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:08:44 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at creativecommunications.com Received: from [192.168.1.145] (unknown [192.168.1.145]) by creativecommunications.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CCD68C235 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:08:44 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4513FC5A.7060402@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:08:10 -0500 From: Andrew Gaffney User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers References: <20060921175501.GI25921@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <4512D9DE.9050405@gentoo.org> <20060921213418.48a9a9fb@snowdrop.home> <4512FACC.3080306@gentoo.org> <4513AC06.8020803@gentoo.org> <4513C5C2.3030207@sejo.be> <4513D3A0.50306@sejo.be> <1158929715.10027.2.camel@localhost> <1158934403.9778.19.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8f21d222-9f64-49cd-898a-bee90ee3d46c X-Archives-Hash: 9fb471c3feed4d10d50c4fdb069c33a1 Peter wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:13:23 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > >> I just want to prefix this by saying that I was simply going to ignore >> your posts in this thread completely due to your obviously inflammatory >> nature at the beginning. Now that you're posting actual constructive >> criticisms, I'd like to respond. By the way, thank you for changing >> your tone to something more productive. >> > > Bunk! Unnecessary to write. Why not just plonk me and be done with it. > Nothing I wrote was inflammatory at all. My criticism of the recruitment > process stand. Your response was welcome. The prefix was condescending and > offensive. > > You, as leaders, have to really think through what your intentions are and > how you are going to deal with people and factions with various > objectives. Telling people they are obviously inflammatory is really not a > strong way to begin. I believe you just proved his point. -- Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project Today's lesson in political correctness: "Go asphyxiate on a phallus" -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list