public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Ross <aross@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Delay in approval of new developers
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 19:25:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4513AC06.8020803@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eev11k$bfu$1@sea.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2775 bytes --]

Peter wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:01:02 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote:
>> Maybe a recruiting drive to help with the maintenance.  A typical
>> business brings on new blood and assigns them just that role to free up
>> more senior developers for more complicated projects.
>>
>> New developers should definitely meet a standard, but the possibility of
>> bringing developers with energy and potential to assist in maintenance
>> might be worth a consideration.
> 
> That's a laugh! Problem is that no devs seem to get approved in a timely
> fashion.

As a recently recruited developer, I'd just like to say that I was very
happy with the approval time of my recruitment bug (#139633), which was
filed on 2006-07-07 and resolved on 2006-08-08.

I understand that not all recruitments occur as quickly as mine, but I
also accept that Gentoo is comprised solely of volunteers, and that
devrel (and particularly recruiters) are understaffed (in terms of
available manhours - not necessarily project members).

> Having developers submit ebuild quizzes and
> then not hear for 6 weeks is silly.

I'll assume here that you're referring to hearing back from recruiters,
rather than a mentor. If a mentor is taking that long to respond they
need to be replaced, as per
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/recruiters/mentor.xml

If recruiters are taking that long, but it's due primarily to a lack of
manpower, then there's not much that can be done to improve the
situation. It's not like the potential-dev has to sit around twiddling
their thumbs - bugs still need to be fixed, and if there's a holdup with
devrel the mentor can offer to commit things on behalf of the recruitee.

Not all developers are cut out to be recruiters, and I'm sure some of
those who have what it takes would rather work on something else :-)
Much like infrastructure, my impression is that being a recruiter isn't
exactly a glamorous role. On top of that, the actions a recruiter must
perform for each recruitment aren't exactly 5 minute jobs:

"Recruiters need to possess several talents in order to successfully
oversee additions to the development team. First and foremost, a
recruiter needs to be a good judge of character. While most new
developer sponsors pick only the best candidates, there have been and
will be occasional duds. Recruiters need to be able to analyze an
individual's background, experience, and past contributions, then use
that information to decide whether or not to accept a developer.
Recruiters also need to be aware of the big picture in order to
recognize weaknesses in the organization and accept developers who will
shore up those weaknesses."
	http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/recruiters/

Cheers

Andrew



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-22  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-21 17:55 [gentoo-dev] seeds, GLEPs, and projects Grant Goodyear
2006-09-21 18:28 ` Simon Stelling
2006-09-21 20:03   ` Joshua Jackson
2006-09-21 20:34   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-09-21 20:49     ` Simon Stelling
2006-09-21 21:01       ` Mike Pagano
2006-09-21 21:43         ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2006-09-22  9:25           ` Andrew Ross [this message]
2006-09-22 10:47             ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Delay in approval of new developers Peter
2006-09-22 11:15               ` Jochen Maes
2006-09-22 11:35                 ` Peter
2006-09-22 12:14                   ` Jochen Maes
2006-09-22 12:29                     ` Peter
2006-09-22 12:44                       ` Simon Stelling
2006-09-22 12:55                       ` Seemant Kulleen
2006-09-22 13:26                         ` Peter
2006-09-22 13:42                           ` Seemant Kulleen
2006-09-22 14:13                           ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-09-22 14:47                             ` Peter
2006-09-22 15:08                               ` Andrew Gaffney
2006-09-22 18:37                           ` Alec Warner
2006-09-22 18:54                             ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-09-22 13:56                         ` Josh Saddler
2006-09-22 13:39                       ` Grant Goodyear
2006-09-22 14:06           ` [gentoo-dev] Re: seeds, GLEPs, and projects Mike Kelly
2006-09-22 14:14             ` Peter
2006-09-25  2:25           ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-09-21 21:24 ` [gentoo-dev] " Lance Albertson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4513AC06.8020803@gentoo.org \
    --to=aross@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox