From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GQAHL-0003Vf-6K for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:10:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8KM9DGo020082; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:09:13 GMT Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz (gw.top-hosting.cz [81.0.254.91]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8KM6Gcg001004 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:06:16 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6413521242 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:06:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.top-hosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.top-hosting.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12714-04 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:06:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (unknown [88.103.51.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.top-hosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69190534A2C for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:06:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4511BB48.5040703@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:06:00 +0200 From: Jakub Moc User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds References: <429613795-1158764726-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-1614084655-@bxe050-cell01.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> <200609192122.29838.mattm@gentoo.org> <20060920212715.5e82c91d@snowdrop.home> <4511A767.3010504@gentoo.org> <20060920221333.52ccd7d4@snowdrop.home> <4511B5AA.8020109@gentoo.org> <20060920225626.06ff3c05@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060920225626.06ff3c05@snowdrop.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF8BA1AB888D44B59CE35CD68" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.3.3 (20050822) at top-hosting.cz X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.515 tagged_above=-999 required=6 tests=[AWL=-0.516, BAYES_50=0.001] X-Spam-Score: -0.515 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 0adad98f-366d-44d0-a392-5a4515472946 X-Archives-Hash: b18859eb9203237ee95ad476f4440cb1 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF8BA1AB888D44B59CE35CD68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:42:02 +0200 Jakub Moc wrote: > | Not that bugging people w/ pointless paperwork would contribute > | anything useful to this new project or get any work done... What > | exactly is there to GLEP at this point? >=20 > A GLEP is not pointless paperwork if done correctly. It can be an > extremely useful way of working out and setting down exactly what the > goals are, and determining how best to achieve them. It's also a good > way of getting input from concerned parties rather than pissing them > off royally by sticking out an announcement about something that could > be seen as stepping on their toes. >=20 You still didn't tell us what's there to GLEP at this point... Oh well, never mind. --=20 jakub --------------enigF8BA1AB888D44B59CE35CD68 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFEbtNhxfV/c66PZ4RA7LnAKCTgyX9oYONXoyA1R0OfmbPe8bMwwCdFh2R iscG4To0YLymFRBmSrmOZYQ= =nOi2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF8BA1AB888D44B59CE35CD68-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list